About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
ew 23(6): e2

Research Article

Comparison and Validation of Five Modulation Strategies for a Dual Active Bridge Converter

Download88 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @ARTICLE{10.4108/ew.v9i6.3066,
        author={Sergio Coelho and Tiago J. C. Sousa and Vitor Monteiro and Luis Machado and Joao L. Afonso and Carlos Couto},
        title={Comparison and Validation of Five Modulation Strategies for a Dual Active Bridge Converter},
        journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web},
        volume={9},
        number={6},
        publisher={EAI},
        journal_a={EW},
        year={2025},
        month={4},
        keywords={Dual Active Bridge Converter, Duty-Cycle Modulation, Single Phase Shift, Dual Phase Shift, Extended Phase Shift, Triple Phase Shift},
        doi={10.4108/ew.v9i6.3066}
    }
    
  • Sergio Coelho
    Tiago J. C. Sousa
    Vitor Monteiro
    Luis Machado
    Joao L. Afonso
    Carlos Couto
    Year: 2025
    Comparison and Validation of Five Modulation Strategies for a Dual Active Bridge Converter
    EW
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/ew.v9i6.3066
Sergio Coelho1,*, Tiago J. C. Sousa1,*, Vitor Monteiro1,*, Luis Machado1,*, Joao L. Afonso1,*, Carlos Couto1,*
  • 1: University of Minho
*Contact email: sergio.coelho@algoritmi.uminho.pt, Tsousa@dei.uminho.pt, Vmonteiro@dei.uminho.pt, Lmachado@dei.uminho.pt, Jla@dei.uminho.pt, Ccouto@dei.uminho.pt

Abstract

This paper addresses the comparison and validation of different modulations for an isolated dc-dc dual active bridge converter (DAB), namely, Duty-Cycle Modulation, Single Phase Shift (SPS), Dual Phase Shift (DPS), Extended Phase Shift (EPS) and Triple Phase Shift (TPS). Given the DAB’s applicability in a wide variety of power electronics branches, several control strategies are being studied to improve its efficiency, by mitigating circulating currents and reactive power. Regardless of the chosen architecture, appropriate modulations must be adopted, assessing which one presents the better cost-benefit ratio. This simulation-based analysis aims to investigate the DAB performance when controlled by the above-mentioned modulations and operating with a nominal power of 3.6 kW. Thus, simulation results show that only SPS, DPS, and TPS are considered suitable, while Duty-Cycle Modulation has time limitations during power transfer and EPS is more appropriate for dynamic power applications. 

Keywords
Dual Active Bridge Converter, Duty-Cycle Modulation, Single Phase Shift, Dual Phase Shift, Extended Phase Shift, Triple Phase Shift
Received
2025-04-11
Accepted
2025-04-11
Published
2025-04-11
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/ew.v9i6.3066

Copyright © 2023 Sergio Coelho et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.

EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL