
Editorial
Mechanism–Data Dual-Driven Outage Identification Framework for Distribution Networks with High Penetration of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation
@ARTICLE{10.4108/ew.14541, author={Ning Liu and Xiaopeng Zhang and Xudong Wang and Guodong Li}, title={Mechanism--Data Dual-Driven Outage Identification Framework for Distribution Networks with High Penetration of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web}, volume={13}, number={1}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={EW}, year={2026}, month={9}, keywords={Active distribution network, distributed generation, outage identification, Dempster--Shafer evidence theory, graph neural network}, doi={10.4108/ew.14541} }- Ning Liu
Xiaopeng Zhang
Xudong Wang
Guodong Li
Year: 2026
Mechanism–Data Dual-Driven Outage Identification Framework for Distribution Networks with High Penetration of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation
EW
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/ew.14541
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: High penetration of inverter-based distributed generators (IBDGs) changes power-flow patterns and fault transients in distribution networks, reducing the effectiveness of conventional outage identification. Under the adopted low-voltage ride-through control model, IBDG fault currents are limited to 1.2–1.5 times the rated current, weakening protection discrimination and degrading classifiers trained on conventional fault features. OBJECTIVES: To address the aforementioned challenges, this paper proposes a mechanism–data dual-driven outage identification framework for distribution networks with high levels of renewable energy penetration. METHODS: The framework integrates improved weighted Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory for multi-source fusion, constructs an IBDG-aware fault-feature library covering converter-specific transient behaviors, and designs decision rules linking post-fault analysis with early fault warning. RESULTS: Under the tested feeder, DG operating schemes, fault cases, and measurement-noise conditions, the proposed method achieved an F1-score of 96.8%. Its measured model-inference-and-fusion latency was 38 ms, compared with 120 ms for the reference implementation. CONCLUSION: Under the tested feeder, operating schemes, fault cases, and measurement-noise conditions, the proposed method also achieved higher outage-identification performance than the implemented comparison methods.
Copyright © 2026 Ning Liu et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.

