
Editorial
An Integrated MOPSO and Fuzzy Decision-Making Algorithmic Framework for Multi-Objective Configuration in High-Proportion Renewable Networks
@ARTICLE{10.4108/ew.14209, author={Yuanping Guo and Yilin Zhong and Xingyan Liu and Ja Yin and Jie Wang}, title={An Integrated MOPSO and Fuzzy Decision-Making Algorithmic Framework for Multi-Objective Configuration in High-Proportion Renewable Networks}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web}, volume={13}, number={1}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={EW}, year={2026}, month={7}, keywords={fuzzy decision-making, pareto optimality, data-driven optimization, deep learning, renewable networks}, doi={10.4108/ew.14209} }- Yuanping Guo
Yilin Zhong
Xingyan Liu
Ja Yin
Jie Wang
Year: 2026
An Integrated MOPSO and Fuzzy Decision-Making Algorithmic Framework for Multi-Objective Configuration in High-Proportion Renewable Networks
EW
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/ew.14209
Abstract
The optimal sizing and configuration of energy storage in networks with high renewable penetration represent a highly complex, multi-constraint, and non-linear optimization problem. Existing planning methods often struggle with premature convergence and lack systematic multi-criteria evaluation for high-dimensional scenarios. This paper proposes a data-driven optimization and evaluation framework integrating a modified Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithm and fuzzy mathematics based on deep learning. First, a time-series production simulation model is established to capture dynamic supply-demand interactions. The MOPSO algorithm is then introduced, utilizing a non-linear adaptive decreasing inertia weight and a Pareto dominance-based update strategy to effectively maintain population diversity and avoid local optima. Finally, to select the best compromise solution from the generated Pareto optimal solution set, a fuzzy membership evaluation algorithm is applied. Simulation on a 20 GW renewable base (16 GW wind + 4 GW PV) with 4 GW thermal regulation shows that a 6‑hour storage yields generation costs of 0.3002–0.4061 CNY/kWh. The proposed MOPSO outperforms NSGA‑II in convergence and solution quality, and fuzzy membership enables optimal trade‑off selection.
Copyright © 2026 Yuanping Guo et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCSA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.

