
Editorial
Research on Multi-Objective Task Scheduling Optimization and Reinforcement Learning Decision-Making Methods for Edge-Cloud Collaborative Scalable Information Systems
@ARTICLE{10.4108/eetsis.14518, author={Lina Guo and Chengyu Sun}, title={Research on Multi-Objective Task Scheduling Optimization and Reinforcement Learning Decision-Making Methods for Edge-Cloud Collaborative Scalable Information Systems}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems}, volume={13}, number={3}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={SIS}, year={2026}, month={9}, keywords={edge-cloud collaboration, multi-objective scheduling, discrete-event simulation, double DQN, statistical audit, reproducibility, throughput consistency}, doi={10.4108/eetsis.14518} }- Lina Guo
Chengyu Sun
Year: 2026
Research on Multi-Objective Task Scheduling Optimization and Reinforcement Learning Decision-Making Methods for Edge-Cloud Collaborative Scalable Information Systems
SIS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eetsis.14518
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Edge-cloud schedulers must coordinate latency, energy, load balance, and deadline compliance under changing demand while keeping task-arrival and throughput units physically consistent. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates MORL-ECSO under an auditable, paired-seed simulation protocol and compares it with tuned heuristic, metaheuristic, value-based, actor-critic, and entropy-regularized baselines. METHODS: A custom Python discrete-event simulator processes individual tasks in 0.1-s event windows. Offered load is 500-2000 tasks/s, with 4-20 edge nodes and four cloud nodes. DQN, A2C, discrete SAC, and MORL-ECSO receive the same 12,000 training transitions; GA and PSO use a population of 40, 30 iterations, and a common objective. Each reported test point uses 30 independent workload seeds after a 10-s warm-up and a 60-s measurement window. Means, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals, paired Wilcoxon tests, Holm correction, and rank-biserial effects are reported. RESULTS: At 2000 tasks/s, MORL-ECSO produced 103.16 ms mean latency, 88.80 kJ energy over 60 s, 94.18% on-time success, and 1947.56 tasks/s throughput. Relative to validation-tuned GA, latency was 18.53% lower, and success was 0.89 percentage points higher. CONCLUSION: Compared to the optimal baseline, MORL-ECSO improves latency and deadline success rate under high loads without significantly altering energy consumption or throughput. In low-capacity scenarios with four nodes, the genetic algorithm remains superior.
Copyright © 2026 Lina Guo, Chengyu Sun, licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BYNC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.

