About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
IoT 24(1):

Research Article

Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning

Download84 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @ARTICLE{10.4108/eetiot.5634,
        author={Rohit  and Shri Ram Manda and Aditya Raj and Akshay Dheeraj and Gopal Singh Rawat and Tanupriya Choudhury},
        title={Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning},
        journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things},
        volume={10},
        number={1},
        publisher={EAI},
        journal_a={IOT},
        year={2024},
        month={4},
        keywords={Lithology, Modelling, Geological Formation, Machine Learning, Hydrocarbon, Strata},
        doi={10.4108/eetiot.5634}
    }
    
  • Rohit
    Shri Ram Manda
    Aditya Raj
    Akshay Dheeraj
    Gopal Singh Rawat
    Tanupriya Choudhury
    Year: 2024
    Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning
    IOT
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eetiot.5634
Rohit 1, Shri Ram Manda1, Aditya Raj1,*, Akshay Dheeraj2, Gopal Singh Rawat1, Tanupriya Choudhury3
  • 1: University of Petroleum and Energy Studies
  • 2: Indian Agricultural Research Institute
  • 3: Graphic Era University
*Contact email: raj05aditya@gmail.com

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Reservoir characterisation and geomechanical modelling benefit significantly from diverse machine learning techniques, addressing complexities inherent in subsurface information. Accurate lithology identification is pivotal, furnishing crucial insights into subsurface geological formations. Lithology is pivotal in appraising hydrocarbon accumulation potential and optimising drilling strategies. OBJECTIVES: This study employs multiple machine learning models to discern lithology from the well-log data of the Volve Field. METHODS: The well log data of the Volve field comprises of 10,220 data points with diverse features influencing the target variable, lithology. The dataset encompasses four primary lithologies—sandstone, limestone, marl, and claystone—constituting a complex subsurface stratum. Lithology identification is framed as a classification problem, and four distinct ML algorithms are deployed to train and assess the models, partitioning the dataset into a 7:3 ratio for training and testing, respectively. RESULTS: The resulting confusion matrix indicates a close alignment between predicted and true labels. While all algorithms exhibit favourable performance, the decision tree algorithm demonstrates the highest efficacy, yielding an exceptional overall accuracy of 0.98. CONCLUSION: Notably, this model's training spans diverse wells within the same basin, showcasing its capability to predict lithology within intricate strata. Additionally, its robustness positions it as a potential tool for identifying other properties of rock formations.

Keywords
Lithology, Modelling, Geological Formation, Machine Learning, Hydrocarbon, Strata
Received
2023-12-26
Accepted
2024-03-28
Published
2024-04-04
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.5634

Copyright © 2024 Rohit et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.

EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL