About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
IoT 24(1):

Research Article

A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression

Download99 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @ARTICLE{10.4108/eetiot.5325,
        author={Susmitha Mandava and Surendra Reddy Vinta and Hritwik Ghosh and Irfan Sadiq Rahat},
        title={A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression},
        journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things},
        volume={10},
        number={1},
        publisher={EAI},
        journal_a={IOT},
        year={2024},
        month={3},
        keywords={Logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, X Gradient Boosting},
        doi={10.4108/eetiot.5325}
    }
    
  • Susmitha Mandava
    Surendra Reddy Vinta
    Hritwik Ghosh
    Irfan Sadiq Rahat
    Year: 2024
    A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression
    IOT
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eetiot.5325
Susmitha Mandava1, Surendra Reddy Vinta1,*, Hritwik Ghosh1, Irfan Sadiq Rahat1
  • 1: Vellore Institute of Technology University
*Contact email: vsurendra.cse@gmail.com

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is a significant health problem worldwide that affects millions of people, and early detection of this disease is crucial for successful treatment and improved patient outcomes. In this research paper, we conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of several machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, X Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree Classifier, Grid Search CV, Random Forest Classifier, AdaBoost Classifier, Gradient Boosting Classifier, XgBoost, Cat Boost Classifier, Extra Trees Classifier, KNN, MLP Classifier, Stochastic gradient descent, and Artificial Neural Network, for the prediction of kidney disease.  In this study, a dataset of patient records was utilized, where each record consisted of twenty-five clinical features, including hypertension, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, appetite and blood urea. The results of our analysis showed that Artificial Neural Network (ANN) outperformed other machine learning algorithms with a maximum accuracy of 100%, while Gaussian Naive Bayes had the lowest accuracy of 94.0%. This suggests that ANN can provide accurate and reliable predictions for kidney disease. The comparative analysis of these algorithms provides valuable insights into their strengths and weaknesses, which can help clinicians choose the most appropriate algorithm for their specific requirements.

Keywords
Logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, X Gradient Boosting
Received
2023-12-12
Accepted
2024-02-29
Published
2024-03-07
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.5325

Copyright © 2024 S. Mandava et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the originalwork is properly cited.

EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL