About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechanics, Electronics Engineering and Automation, ICMEEA 2026, April 24-26, 2026, Singapore, Singapore

Research Article

From Logical Effort to Machine Learning: A Survey on Delay Modeling in Digital Circuits

Download5 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.24-4-2026.2364893,
        author={Yifan  Liu},
        title={From Logical Effort to Machine Learning: A Survey on Delay Modeling in Digital Circuits},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechanics, Electronics Engineering and Automation, ICMEEA 2026, April 24-26, 2026, Singapore, Singapore},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICMEEA},
        year={2026},
        month={9},
        keywords={Digital Circuit Delay Modeling Electronic Design Automation Graph Neural Networks Timing Prediction AI-Native Design},
        doi={10.4108/eai.24-4-2026.2364893}
    }
    
  • Yifan Liu
    Year: 2026
    From Logical Effort to Machine Learning: A Survey on Delay Modeling in Digital Circuits
    ICMEEA
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.24-4-2026.2364893
Yifan Liu1,*
  • 1: Faculty of Innovation and Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, ZhuHai, China
*Contact email: 1230017284@student.must.edu.mo

Abstract

As the process nodes of integrated circuits approach the nanoscale, precise delay modeling has become a key factor in determining the performance and reliability of chips. Traditional model-based methods have limitations. In contrast, the modeling paradigm based on machine learning has significant advantages. However, the two approaches have different fundamental ideas. This paper takes the technological development process of digital circuit delay modeling as an example, reviews the development history and comparison of the classic logic effort theory and machine learning techniques, and constructs a framework to analyze the differences between these two types of modeling methods from aspects such as modeling philosophy, accuracy and efficiency, interpretability, data dependence, and generalization ability. It is found that the two modeling ideas are not in a replacement relationship but complement each other. The traditional formula-driven method has high interpretability and is an effective method for simulation and design of core devices at the current stage; while the data-driven modeling method can obtain more accurate results by learning from large-scale data. From a practical perspective, the trend of big data and high computing power is unstoppable. Therefore, as the two continue to integrate, it will further promote development. Eventually, it will drive EDA towards a more intelligent "AI-native" direction.

Keywords
Digital Circuit Delay Modeling, Electronic Design Automation, Graph Neural Networks, Timing Prediction, AI-Native Design
Published
2026-09-02
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-4-2026.2364893
Copyright © 2026–2026 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center
  • Cookie Preferences

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL