About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
ew 21(34): e4

Research Article

Modelling state spaces and discrete control using MILP: computational cost considerations for demand response

Download906 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @ARTICLE{10.4108/eai.23-12-2020.167787,
        author={P. L. Magalh\"{a}es and C. H. Antunes},
        title={Modelling state spaces and discrete control using MILP: computational cost considerations for demand response},
        journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web},
        volume={8},
        number={34},
        publisher={EAI},
        journal_a={EW},
        year={2020},
        month={12},
        keywords={computational performance, state space, discrete control, mixed-integer linear programming, multiple-choice programming},
        doi={10.4108/eai.23-12-2020.167787}
    }
    
  • P. L. Magalhães
    C. H. Antunes
    Year: 2020
    Modelling state spaces and discrete control using MILP: computational cost considerations for demand response
    EW
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.23-12-2020.167787
P. L. Magalhães1,*, C. H. Antunes2
  • 1: INESC Coimbra, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rua Sílvio Lima, Pólo II, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 2: University of Coimbra, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rua Sílvio Lima, Pólo II, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal
*Contact email: pmlpm@deec.uc.pt

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Demand response (DR) has been proposed as a mechanism to induce electricity cost reductions and is typically assumed to require the adoption of time-differentiated electricity prices. Making the most of these requires using automated energy management systems to produce optimised DR plans. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) has been used for this purpose, including by modelling dynamic systems (DS).

OBJECTIVES: In this paper, wecompare the computational performance of MILP approaches for modelling state spaces and multi-level discrete control (MLDC) in DR problems involving DSs.

METHODS: A state-of-the-art MILP solver was used to compute solutions and compare approaches.

RESULTS: Modelling state spaces using decision variables proved to be the most efficient option in over 80% of cases. In turn, the new MLDC approaches outperformed the standard one in about 60% of cases despite performing in the same range.

CONCLUSION: We conclude that using state variables is generally the better option and that all MLDC variants perform similarly.

Keywords
computational performance, state space, discrete control, mixed-integer linear programming, multiple-choice programming
Received
2020-09-05
Accepted
2020-12-03
Published
2020-12-23
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-12-2020.167787

Copyright © 2020 P.L. Magalhães et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unlimited use, distribution and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.

EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL