About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 11th International Applied Business and Engineering Conference, ABEC 2023, September 21st, 2023, Bengkalis, Riau, Indonesia

Research Article

Machine Learning Approaches for Fish Pond Water Quality Classification: Random Forest, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree Comparison

Download315 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.21-9-2023.2342964,
        author={Danuri  Danuri and Muhammad Syafiq Mohd Pozi},
        title={Machine Learning Approaches for Fish Pond Water Quality Classification: Random Forest, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree Comparison},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 11th International Applied Business and Engineering Conference, ABEC 2023, September 21st, 2023, Bengkalis, Riau, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ABEC},
        year={2024},
        month={2},
        keywords={fish pond water quality classification machine learning},
        doi={10.4108/eai.21-9-2023.2342964}
    }
    
  • Danuri Danuri
    Muhammad Syafiq Mohd Pozi
    Year: 2024
    Machine Learning Approaches for Fish Pond Water Quality Classification: Random Forest, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree Comparison
    ABEC
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.21-9-2023.2342964
Danuri Danuri1,*, Muhammad Syafiq Mohd Pozi2
  • 1: Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis
  • 2: Universiti Utara Malaysia
*Contact email: danuri@polbeng.ac.id

Abstract

The health and production of fish in fish farms are greatly influenced by the water quality. This study examines three Machine Learning(ML) methods for categorizing fish pond water quality: Random Forest(RF), Gaussian Naive Bayes(GNB), and Decision Tree(DT). Accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1-Score as a performance indicator are taken into account while evaluating the model. The evaluation findings reveal that RF and GNB outperform DT in every evaluation criteria. GNB, with a rating of 0.958932, had the highest accuracy, followed by RF, with a value of 0.955822, and DT, with a value of 0.932269. The consistent performance of GNB and RF in precision, recall, and F1-Score underscores their superiority.

Keywords
fish pond water quality classification machine learning
Published
2024-02-19
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-9-2023.2342964
Copyright © 2023–2025 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL