Research Article
How to Make Business Processes “Socialize”?
@ARTICLE{10.4108/eai.17-9-2015.150284, author={Zakaria Maamar and Noura Faci and Ejub Kajan and Sherif Sakr and Mohamed Boukhebouze and Ahmed Barnawi}, title={How to Make Business Processes “Socialize”?}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems}, volume={2}, number={5}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={INIS}, year={2015}, month={9}, keywords={Business process; Machine; Network; Person; Social relation; Task}, doi={10.4108/eai.17-9-2015.150284} }
- Zakaria Maamar
Noura Faci
Ejub Kajan
Sherif Sakr
Mohamed Boukhebouze
Ahmed Barnawi
Year: 2015
How to Make Business Processes “Socialize”?
INIS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-9-2015.150284
Abstract
This paper presents an approach that builds upon social computing principles to make business processes “socialize”. First the approach identifies the main components of a business process that are task, person, and machine. A task is a work unit that forms with other tasks a business process and that a person and/or machine execute. Afterwards the approach enriches a business process with details captured from the (execution and social) relations that connect tasks together, persons together, and machines together. While execution relations are widely reported in the literature, there is a growing interest in studying the role of social relations in business processes. The approach uses social relations to build configuration network of tasks, social network of persons, and support network of machines. These networks capture the ongoing interactions that arise when business processes are executed. A system illustrating how these networks are developed is also demonstrated in the paper.
Copyright © 2015 Zakaria Maamar et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unlimited use, distribution and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.