Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 12 October 2019, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Research Article

A Comparison between Generative Learning and Conventional Learning Model on Students’ Mathematical Literacy in the 21st century

Download416 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296539,
        author={Ellis  Salsabila and Wardani  Rahayu and Selly Anastassia Amellia Kharis and Agustiani  Putri},
        title={A Comparison between Generative Learning and Conventional Learning Model on Students’ Mathematical Literacy in the 21st century},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 12 October 2019, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={MSCEIS},
        year={2020},
        month={7},
        keywords={analytic geometry generative learning model mathematical literacy},
        doi={10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296539}
    }
    
  • Ellis Salsabila
    Wardani Rahayu
    Selly Anastassia Amellia Kharis
    Agustiani Putri
    Year: 2020
    A Comparison between Generative Learning and Conventional Learning Model on Students’ Mathematical Literacy in the 21st century
    MSCEIS
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296539
Ellis Salsabila1,*, Wardani Rahayu1, Selly Anastassia Amellia Kharis1, Agustiani Putri1
  • 1: Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta Timur 13220, Indonesia
*Contact email: ellissalsabila@yahoo.com

Abstract

Mathematical literacy concentrates on students' ability to analyze, prove, and express ideas completely, solve, and interpret mathematically. The objective of the study was to distinguish between the generative learning model and the conventional learning model on students’ mathematical literacy. This study adopted the quasi-experimental research design. The performance continued for four weeks and at the end of the program, post-test compositions were obtained from the nominees. The sample for the study was performed of 72 undergraduate students represented from two classes. Purposive sampling method was applied in selecting the sample. The results of the research presented that there was a significant discrepancy among the t-test score points of the generative learning and conventional group (P<0.05), namely tcount =4.044 > ttable=1.667. Therefore, it can be concluded that the average of students’ mathematical literacy skill scores with the generative learning group was higher than the conventional learning group.