Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 12 October 2019, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Research Article

A Comparative Study of Blindhide and Filterfirst Algorithm in Digital Images for Steganography Techniques

Download560 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296320,
        author={Purwantoro  Purwantoro and Garno  Garno and Munir  Munir and Ari  Suntia},
        title={A Comparative Study of Blindhide and Filterfirst Algorithm in Digital Images for Steganography Techniques},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 12 October 2019, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={MSCEIS},
        year={2020},
        month={7},
        keywords={steganography embedding blindhide filterfirst digital invisible ink toolkit},
        doi={10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296320}
    }
    
  • Purwantoro Purwantoro
    Garno Garno
    Munir Munir
    Ari Suntia
    Year: 2020
    A Comparative Study of Blindhide and Filterfirst Algorithm in Digital Images for Steganography Techniques
    MSCEIS
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296320
Purwantoro Purwantoro1,*, Garno Garno1, Munir Munir2, Ari Suntia2
  • 1: Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Jl. H.S. Ronggowaluyo Telukjambe Karawang
  • 2: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl Dr. Setiabudi Isola Sukasari Bandung
*Contact email: purwantoro.masbro@staff.unsika.ac.id

Abstract

The study was conducted in the field of hiding messages using the media image. This model is often referred to as steganography technique. Image media used for insertion are BMP (Bitmap Picture) format images, JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and PNG (Portable Network Graphics). The secret message form that is inserted is in the txt format. The application used for insertion is the Digital Invisible Ink Toolkit. Research parameters include image quality testing, and quantitative testing on each Blindhide algorithm and the Filterfirst algorithm. Image Quality test results using MSE, PSNR, showed significant differences, while the value of SC showed differences but not substantial. The results of testing and analysis evaluations that have been carried out on each image turned out to be an average value of the MSE value of the Blindhide algorithm 0.024 greater than the Filterfirst algorithm 0.023, PSNR Blindhide algorithm 31.91 smaller than the Filterfirst 32.03 algorithm, SC Blindhide algorithm 0.99986 smaller than the Filterfirst algorithm 0.99988. This shows that the insertion of a secret message into the image using the Filterfirst algorithm is safer and will not be suspected.