Research Article
RapidRead: Step-At-A-Glance Crisis Checklists
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254954, author={Jesse Cirimele and Leslie Wu and Kristen Leach and Stuart Card and T Kyle Harrison and Larry Chu and Scott Klemmer}, title={RapidRead: Step-At-A-Glance Crisis Checklists}, proceedings={8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare}, publisher={ICST}, proceedings_a={PERVASIVEHEALTH}, year={2014}, month={7}, keywords={checklists medicine procedure aids cognitive aids}, doi={10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254954} }
- Jesse Cirimele
Leslie Wu
Kristen Leach
Stuart Card
T Kyle Harrison
Larry Chu
Scott Klemmer
Year: 2014
RapidRead: Step-At-A-Glance Crisis Checklists
PERVASIVEHEALTH
ACM
DOI: 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254954
Abstract
Complex, perilous domains like surgery and aviation require accurate responses under extreme time constraints. Checklists improve important outcomes in these domains. However, current designs are based largely on intuition; there is little theory or empirical work about designing effective procedure aids. Furthermore, discretionary checklist use is fragmented and bursty rather than predictable and continuous. Working with doctors and studying successful aids, we developed the RapidRead design approach. It distills three patterns for designing rapidly readable aids: Dynamic Focus, Object-Action, and Information Patches. Two experiments compared medical professionals’ search time, eye-gaze, and retention with alternative checklist designs. Applying RapidRead patterns resulted in significantly faster aid usage, reducing answer time and importantly minimizing the frequency of slow responses to medical queries.