7th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks

Research Article

Evaluation of Multi-Objective Optimizers for Cognitive Radio using Psychometric Methods

Download557 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/icst.crowncom.2012.248438,
        author={Carl Dietrich and Edward Wolfe and Garrett Vanhoy},
        title={Evaluation of Multi-Objective Optimizers for Cognitive Radio using Psychometric Methods},
        proceedings={7th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks},
        publisher={IEEE},
        proceedings_a={CROWNCOM},
        year={2012},
        month={7},
        keywords={cognitive radio; psychometric; item response methods; rasch measurement},
        doi={10.4108/icst.crowncom.2012.248438}
    }
    
  • Carl Dietrich
    Edward Wolfe
    Garrett Vanhoy
    Year: 2012
    Evaluation of Multi-Objective Optimizers for Cognitive Radio using Psychometric Methods
    CROWNCOM
    IEEE
    DOI: 10.4108/icst.crowncom.2012.248438
Carl Dietrich1,*, Edward Wolfe2, Garrett Vanhoy3
  • 1: Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, USA
  • 2: Pearson, Iowa City, IA, USA
  • 3: Electrical Engineering and Mathematics, University of Arizona, USA
*Contact email: cdietric@vt.edu

Abstract

Item response models (IRMs) developed for use in fields such as education and psychology are applicable to cognitive radio testing due to parallels between cognitive radio and human cognition appear likely to enable efficient, and possibly adaptive testing of cognitive radios. A simulation study used unidimensional and multidimensional item response models to evaluate multi-objective cognitive engine optimizers based on two types of optimization algorithm: genetic algorithms and generalized pattern search. Data are presented in the context of cognitive radio and data are presented in a format that enables visualization of some characteristics of test items (optimization tasks) and optimizer performance identified by the IRMs. While the visualization provides intuitive confirmation of the IRM results, the IRMs identified additional significant effects that are not readily visible.