
Editorial
FootSense: An AI-Augmented Foot-Tactile System for Emotion and Social Regulation in Pervasive Health Contexts
@ARTICLE{10.4108/eetpht.11.11061, author={Zhulin Shi and Hao Zhou and Liuqing Chen and Yao Chen and Guanghui Huang and Weiqiang Ying}, title={FootSense: An AI-Augmented Foot-Tactile System for Emotion and Social Regulation in Pervasive Health Contexts}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions of Pervasive Health and Technology}, volume={11}, number={1}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={PHAT}, year={2026}, month={1}, keywords={foot-tactile interaction, AI-augmented ambient intelligence, emotional regulation, social approach behavior, multi-mechanism model, wearable haptic system, digital health intervention}, doi={10.4108/eetpht.11.11061} }- Zhulin Shi
Hao Zhou
Liuqing Chen
Yao Chen
Guanghui Huang
Weiqiang Ying
Year: 2026
FootSense: An AI-Augmented Foot-Tactile System for Emotion and Social Regulation in Pervasive Health Contexts
PHAT
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eetpht.11.11061
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: FootSense proposes a novel approach to emotional and social regulation through foot-tactile feedback in public spaces. Unlike conventional upper-body haptic systems, it utilizes the feet as a discreet, low-interference interface. By integrating rhythmic, directional, and social-cue tactile stimulation, FootSense modulates emotional states and enhances social interactions in dynamic environments. OBJECTIVES:This study aims to develop and validate a multi-mechanism foot-tactile model that facilitates emotional relief and social approach in real-world public settings. METHODS:We developed FootSense, an AI-augmented ambient intelligence system combining behavioral sensing, contextual inference, and adaptive tactile feedback. A two-week field experiment (N=200, five groups) was conducted across four public environments—mall, campus, hospital, and transit hub—to compare rhythmic, directional, and fusion tactile modes. Data were analyzed via ANOVA, mixed-effects modeling, and correlation analysis. RESULTS: Rhythmic feedback reduced state anxiety (ΔSAI = –7.5, p<.01), directional feedback increased social approach (+83% vs. control, p<.01), and fusion mode showed the strongest overall effects (ΔSAI = –9.3, p<.001; +121% approach frequency). Tactile activation frequency correlated with improvements (r=.46–.51, p<.05). Environmental factors (noise, crowd density) moderated outcomes, with greater benefits in high-stress settings. CONCLUSION:Embodied, AI-driven foot-tactile feedback offers an effective low-intrusion intervention for emotion regulation and social engagement across diverse public contexts. This work provides a theoretical and practical foundation for integrating AI-augmented haptics into pervasive health and human-centered urban design.
Copyright © 2026 Zhulin Shi et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.


