Research Article
AI_deation: A Creative Knowledge Mining Method for Design Exploration
@ARTICLE{10.4108/eetct.v9i3.2685, author={George Palamas and Alejandra Mesa Guerra and Liana-Dorina M\`{u}sb\c{c}k}, title={AI_deation: A Creative Knowledge Mining Method for Design Exploration}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on Creative Technologies}, volume={9}, number={3}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={CT}, year={2022}, month={11}, keywords={graphic design, visualization, design exploration, machine learning, gradient-based analysis, design theory, ideation}, doi={10.4108/eetct.v9i3.2685} }
- George Palamas
Alejandra Mesa Guerra
Liana-Dorina Møsbæk
Year: 2022
AI_deation: A Creative Knowledge Mining Method for Design Exploration
CT
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eetct.v9i3.2685
Abstract
Ideation is a core activity in the design process which begins with a design brief and results in a range of design concepts. However, due to its exploratory nature it is challenging to formalise computationally. Here, we report a creative knowledge mining method that combines design theory with a machine learning approach. This study begins by introducing a graphic design style classification model that acts as a model for the aesthetic evaluation of images. A Grad-CAM technique is used to visualise where our model is looking at in order to detect and interpret visual syntax, such as geometric influences and color gradients, to determine the most influential visual semiotics. Our comparative analysis on two Nordic design referents suggests that our approach can be efficiently used to support and motivate design exploration. Based on these findings, we discuss the prospects of machine vision aided design systems to envisage concepts and possible design paths, but also to support educational objectives.
Copyright © 2022 George Palamas et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.