Research Article
Slack on Evidence System: Entrance of “Coerced Corruption” to Public Procurement Mistakes in Indonesia
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.8-6-2021.2314361, author={Tri Andari Dahlan}, title={Slack on Evidence System: Entrance of “Coerced Corruption” to Public Procurement Mistakes in Indonesia}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2021, June 8-9 2021, Semarang, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICILS}, year={2022}, month={2}, keywords={proof error corruption public procurement}, doi={10.4108/eai.8-6-2021.2314361} }- Tri Andari Dahlan
Year: 2022
Slack on Evidence System: Entrance of “Coerced Corruption” to Public Procurement Mistakes in Indonesia
ICILS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.8-6-2021.2314361
Abstract
Administrative and civil (contractual) mistakes in several cases of public procurement have been "forced" to submit to the formulation of acts of corruption that are detrimental to the State. For this reason, an understanding of the legal consequences arising from each stage of the implementation of the public procurement needs to be classified. Administrative mistakes in the procurement process, not optimal implementation and control of contracts are not things that automatically lead to the classification of corruption. Failure in contract execution, is there always a manipulative element in the selection process? Is the forgery/lack of provider data a mistake in the selection/auction process? Bribery or gratification, mark up, fictitious, collusion, fraud and forgery are some of the acts that can be classified as corruption, and that must be proven firmly and not loosely. "Not every mistake is a crime".
