Research Article
Effectiveness of Teams Teaching-Hybrid Learning (TTHL) in Higher Education
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284036, author={Kholilur Rahman and Abdul Hamid Wahid and Irfan Afandi and Muhammad Mushfi El Iq Bali and Lukman Hakim}, title={Effectiveness of Teams Teaching-Hybrid Learning (TTHL) in Higher Education }, proceedings={Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={WESTECH}, year={2019}, month={6}, keywords={team teaching hybrid learning higher education}, doi={10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284036} }- Kholilur Rahman
Abdul Hamid Wahid
Irfan Afandi
Muhammad Mushfi El Iq Bali
Lukman Hakim
Year: 2019
Effectiveness of Teams Teaching-Hybrid Learning (TTHL) in Higher Education
WESTECH
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284036
Abstract
This study aims to determine the significance of differences in the lecture process before and after implementing Team Teaching-Hybrid Learning (TTHL). This research was conducted at Nurul Jadid University Paiton Probolinggo and IAI Ibrahimy Genteng Banyuwangi. The study population was all third-semester students of Nurul Jadid University Paiton Probolinggo and IAI Ibrahimy Genteng Banyuwangi with education statistics courses. The research sample was purposive sampling technique. Quantitative research using the quasi-experimental method uses non-equivalent control group design with the TTHL pre-test and post-test treatment. Data analysis techniques using descriptive analysis and hypothesis testing include Manova test and t-test. Testing the hypothesis prerequisites using the normality test (Column of Smirnov) and homogeneity test (Box’s Manova). The results showed that from multivariate testing with Sig. (p) 0.000 < 0.05 which means the first hypothesis (H1) is accepted. TTHL is also proven to be effective in improving learning outcomes as evidenced by the comparison of the mean values of increase (significance) of the experimental class and the control class which have a difference in the value of 14.57 with the advantages of the experimental group (24.26: 9.69). In addition, the results of the hypothesis test obtained the Sig. (p) equal to 0.017 < 0.05 which means the second hypothesis (H1) is accepted.
