Research Article
Development of Kahoot Application-Based Learning Evaluation Tool Using Smartphones in Civic Education Lessons for Class XI of Madrasah Students
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284033, author={Ali Basriadi and Ridwan Ridwan and Sukardi Sukardi and Ana Rusmardiana and B Herawan Hayadi}, title={Development of Kahoot Application-Based Learning Evaluation Tool Using Smartphones in Civic Education Lessons for Class XI of Madrasah Students}, proceedings={Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={WESTECH}, year={2019}, month={6}, keywords={kahoot application civic education madrasah}, doi={10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284033} }- Ali Basriadi
Ridwan Ridwan
Sukardi Sukardi
Ana Rusmardiana
B Herawan Hayadi
Year: 2019
Development of Kahoot Application-Based Learning Evaluation Tool Using Smartphones in Civic Education Lessons for Class XI of Madrasah Students
WESTECH
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284033
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop Kahoot-based learning evaluation tools where lately technology has developed in education. The researcher developed a Kahoot-based learning evaluation tool by utilizing the potential that exists in the Batam high school state Islamic senior high school with the availability of Wi-Fi networks. This research method uses the Research and Development (R & D) method with a 4D model. The instruments used were questionnaires and questions about the pretest and posttest. Pretest and posttest questions are used to evaluate student learning outcomes. As for the results of the material expert validation, the percentage of 86% criteria was very valid, the media expert was 81% with Valid criteria, the teacher of civic education was 88.6% with valid criteria, Language 81% with valid criteria and 89.25% development trial, the field test was 83.4%. The results of pretest data analysis on average were 62.76%, and the posttest average was 73.43%. As for the pretest normality test results obtained sig values 0.59 > 0.05 which are categorized as Normal, Homogeneity test results obtained sig 0.021> 0.05 which are categorized as not Homogeneity two pretest and posttest variables that do not get a difference. The t-test uses paired sample t-test, then the sig value is 0.000 value <0.05, then Ho is rejected H1 is accepted because there are differences in the two variables pretest and posttest.
