Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium on Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (ICIIS) in Conjunction with the 3rd International Conference on Quran and Hadith Studies (ICONQUHAS)

Research Article

Comparison of C4.5 and Naïve Bayes Algorithm for Mustahik Classification

Download45 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.7-11-2019.2294560,
        author={Hendra Bayu Suseno and Awliya  Wanhari and Siti Ummi Masruroh},
        title={Comparison of C4.5 and Na\~{n}ve Bayes Algorithm for Mustahik Classification},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium on Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (ICIIS) in Conjunction with the 3rd International Conference on Quran and Hadith Studies (ICONQUHAS)},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICIIS},
        year={2020},
        month={5},
        keywords={zakat mustahik muzakki c45 algorithm naive bayes  algorithm accuracy execution time split validation},
        doi={10.4108/eai.7-11-2019.2294560}
    }
    
  • Hendra Bayu Suseno
    Awliya Wanhari
    Siti Ummi Masruroh
    Year: 2020
    Comparison of C4.5 and Naïve Bayes Algorithm for Mustahik Classification
    ICIIS
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.7-11-2019.2294560
Hendra Bayu Suseno1,*, Awliya Wanhari1, Siti Ummi Masruroh1
  • 1: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta Indonesia
*Contact email: hendra.bayu@uinjkt.ac.id

Abstract

Zakat is one of the pillars of Islam that must be done for all Muslims. People who fulfill zakat are called muzakki and people who receive zakat are called mustahik. However there’s main problems of the Amil Zakat Agency related to distribution of zakat funds which are sometimes not fulfill on the target needed. Based on these problems, this study aims to analyze the comparison of the C4.5 and Naive Bayes algorithms for the classification of mustahik determination. The results of the study concluded that it was found that the use of the C4.5 algorithm is better than the Naive Bayes algorithm, proved by the level of accuracy starting from 75% - 100%, while using the Naive Bayes algorithm the level of accuracy starts from 50% - 100% and the execution time of each algorithm was similar which is 0 s. The results of the accuracy in this research are obtained through RapidMinerStudio tools using split validation.