Application of Article 378 of The Criminal Law in The Issuance of Blank Bilyet Giro (Case Study Of Decision Number 291/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Yyk)

Bilyet giro is another sort of protection contrasted with different protections by request, is a book move request that capabilities for installment. Notwithstanding, practically speaking, there is, in many cases, a misrepresentation against the billet giro, often known as a void billet giro, bringing about installment disappointments. The plan of the issue in this review is the utilization of Article 378 of the Lawbreaker Code in Choice No. 291/Pid.B/2014/PN. Yyk. is as per the material legitimate arrangements, and what is the reason for the appointed authority's thought in pursuing choices against culprits of criminal demonstrations of extortion that to have the option to demonstrate that the Respondent is shown not at fault for carrying out a crook demonstration of misrepresentation, where there should be components in Article 378 of the Crook Code for the wrongdoing of misrepresentation, parts with the expectation of helping oneself or someone else illegal. While the reason for the appointed authority's thought in pursuing a choice against the culprits of the wrongdoing of extortion in Choice No. 291/Pid.B/2014/PN.Yyk. They expressed that the Litigant was demonstrated to have carried out the go-about as charged to him. However, the demonstration was not a lawbreaker as managed in Article 378 of the Crook Code.