Research Article
Liability For Money Laundry Criminal Actions According To Law No. 8 Of 2010
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.6-5-2023.2333411, author={Berry Ballen Saputra and Azis Budianto and Riswadi Riswadi}, title={Liability For Money Laundry Criminal Actions According To Law No. 8 Of 2010}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2023, 6 May 2023, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLSSEE}, year={2023}, month={7}, keywords={crime money laundry eradication}, doi={10.4108/eai.6-5-2023.2333411} }- Berry Ballen Saputra
Azis Budianto
Riswadi Riswadi
Year: 2023
Liability For Money Laundry Criminal Actions According To Law No. 8 Of 2010
ICLSSEE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.6-5-2023.2333411
Abstract
Today's money laundering has penetrated various aspects and developed in line with the development of technology. The perpetrators of money laundering use technology as a tool and financial/banking service providers as a place to carry out money laundering. White-collar crime or commonly known as white-collar crime is committed by utilizing technological sophistication ranging from manual to extra-sophisticated or super-sophisticated that enters the virtual world (cyberspace) so that white-collar crime in money laundering is called cyber laundering which is part of cybercrime supported by sufficient knowledge of banking, business, and electronic banking. This research is included in the normative research used by researchers in discussing the problem of money laundering by examining existing literature or what is written in laws and regulations. In light of the portrayal and conversation, it is reasoned that in Indonesia, the wrongdoing of tax evasion is directed in Regulation no. 8 of 2010 concerning the Counteraction and Annihilation of Tax evasion Wrongdoings. Culprits who perpetrate criminal demonstrations of illegal tax avoidance can be considered criminally dependable assuming that they have satisfied the components of discipline, in particular the capacity to be liable for the enterprise, the presence of slip-ups, and no great explanation for criminal discounts on partnerships.
