Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2021, March 6th 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia

Research Article

The Public Prosecutor's Investigation Based on Article 39 of Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning Illegal Logging

Download305 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306851,
        author={Armen  Wijaya and Zudan Arif Fakrulloh},
        title={The Public Prosecutor's Investigation Based on Article 39 of Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning Illegal Logging},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE  2021, March 6th 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICLSSEE},
        year={2021},
        month={5},
        keywords={public prosecutors; investigation; illegal logging},
        doi={10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306851}
    }
    
  • Armen Wijaya
    Zudan Arif Fakrulloh
    Year: 2021
    The Public Prosecutor's Investigation Based on Article 39 of Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning Illegal Logging
    ICLSSEE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306851
Armen Wijaya1,*, Zudan Arif Fakrulloh1
  • 1: Student Program Doctor of Law Borobudur University, Jl. Pemuda, RT.1/RW.3, Rawamangun, Kec. Pulo Gadung, DKI Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
*Contact email: wijayaarmen@gmail.com

Abstract

Illegal logging is the activity of logging, transporting and selling timber, a form of real threat around borders that are illegal or do not have permission from local authorities. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the unlawful logging model carried out by the Public Prosecutor based on Article 39 of Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning illegal logging. This study uses a legal methodology with a literature approach which is part of qualitative research. We use existing data in the library and a functional system in these books. This study concludes that the investigation carried out by the Public Prosecutor is carried out based on the applicable criminal procedure law, but what the public Prosecutor needs to do is to look at the evidence findings that must strengthen the punishment for the forest destroyer.