Limited Reerse Evidentiary System in the Basic Perspective of Presumption of Innocence

The Reverse Proof System is Limited and Balanced based on Article 77 of Law No. 8 of 2010 and the provisions of kuhap. The evidence of the reverse is limited and balanced", that the defendant has the right to prove that he did not commit the crimes alleged against him and the public prosecutor is still obliged to prove his indictment. The arrangement creates concerns for perpetrators of money laundering crimes, because the reverse evidentiary system can not necessarily be implemented optimally, given that there are some juridical problems that are likely to occur, namely contrary to the Basic Principles of Criminal Law, namely the principle of presumption of innocence. On the other hand, the system adopted is also contrary to Law No. 48 of 2009, that which can bring out the wrong verdict or not a person is a judge. This research method uses normative juridical research. The result of this research is that the provisions of Article 77 of Law No. 8 of 2010 need to be changed so as to provide legal certainty for the accused and not contrary to the principle of presumption of innocence and the system adopted in Law No. 48 of 2009.