Reconciliation as Problem Solution of Sharia Economic Dispute in Religious Court

Since the decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 93 / PUU-X / 2012, which states that sharia economic disputes resolution is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. Of course, this authority requires law as a tool in resolving sharia economic disputes in both formal and material law. The reality is that the use of procedural law in sharia economic dispute resolution applies civil procedural law as it employs general courts. This raises problems for Religious Court Judges. As a Muslim, it would be against his conscience. Resolving sharia disputes, but must use the procedural law inherited from the Dutch colonialists which are contradictory to Islamic law. For this reason, as a solution to these problems, peace is the best choice for resolving sharia economic disputes as long as there is no Islamic judicial procedure law to be applied in the Indonesian Religious Court. This solution for this advantage answers doubts about the use of civil procedural law. Reconciliation is very good and recommended, as ordered by the religion of Islam. Even though there are differences between civil procedural law in general courts and Islamic judicial procedural law, there is no difference in the context of good peace, both of them prioritize the settlement of a dispute by well-disposed means which is the best solution to be accepted by all parties without hostility.