Research Article
A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.6-11-2019.2297253, author={Achmad Farid Wadjdi and Putri Hayuningtyas}, title={A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts}, proceedings={Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies, ICSGS 2019, 6-7 November 2019, Sari Pacific, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICSGS}, year={2020}, month={11}, keywords={agenda-setting mining conflicts multicriteria decision‐making public policy}, doi={10.4108/eai.6-11-2019.2297253} }- Achmad Farid Wadjdi
Putri Hayuningtyas
Year: 2020
A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts
ICSGS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.6-11-2019.2297253
Abstract
The negative externality effects of government policies, such as foreign investment for mining exploration and extraction, can cause considerable inefficiencies in efforts to strengthen national defense. To overcome the problem, we propose a framework based on the BOCR approach that integrates AHP, DEMATEL, and FMEA to identify and evaluate the factors covered. AHP is directed to the fundamental questions related to the weighting of the hazard level, while DEMATEL is for the causal question related to the weighting of the likelihood of occurrence. Finally, FMEA is implemented to assess the priority of a risk-based sequential agenda as a cause and effect. A case study of the agenda-setting to deal with negative externalities of foreign mining policies in Indonesia is presented as an example of the proposed MCDM framework. The results indicate that the proposed framework is useful in formulating the agenda-setting.
