Research Article
Indonesia’s Combat for Peace and Justice: A Bird’s Eye View of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) 16
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.5-8-2019.2308668, author={Wicipto Setiadi}, title={Indonesia’s Combat for Peace and Justice: A Bird’s Eye View of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) 16 }, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Rights, I-COFFEES 2019, 5-6 August 2019, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={I-COFFEES}, year={2021}, month={6}, keywords={corruption; sdgs; peace and justice;}, doi={10.4108/eai.5-8-2019.2308668} }- Wicipto Setiadi
Year: 2021
Indonesia’s Combat for Peace and Justice: A Bird’s Eye View of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) 16
I-COFFEES
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.5-8-2019.2308668
Abstract
This paper aims to distinguish the current progress of SDG 16 implementation in Indonesia from a governance perspective and it’s interconnectedness with Indonesia’s past, present, and future technocratic plans. Although Goal 16 has numerous benefits to improve the quality of humanity and society itself, Indonesia has managed to synchronize, yet there are still critical dispute on how inclusive and progressive Goal 16 is when implemented in practice. The overall paper was based on desk and literary review from highlighting several standpoints on Goal 16 particularly on; a. Corruption and Bribery, b. Participatory Approach, and c. Institutional Building Capacity. Further, Indonesia commitment on actualizing SDGs is reflected on the participation of Voluntary National Review 2017. Surprisingly, Indonesia turns to be one of 6 countries that has outstanding best practice of compares to others. In the future, the commitment is continued to the mainstreaming all SDGs target into National Development Medium Plan (Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah/RPJMN 2020 – 2024). Though, there are still issues need to be settled, but with SDGs mainstreaming into RPJMN 2020 – 2024 hopefully the sustainability of the agenda is rest assured. The paper presented is based on literature reviews and documents relating to the subject at hand. From this research, systematic writing was produced using a juridical-analytical approach and qualitative results was obtained.
