Research Article
Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 Towards Consumer Financing Institutions
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304559, author={Sundaru Guntur Wibowo and Hedy Pandowo and Ahmad Khudori and Galuh Try Prawesti}, title={Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 Towards Consumer Financing Institutions}, proceedings={Proceedings of the First International Conference on Economics, Business and Social Humanities, ICONEBS 2020, November 4-5, 2020, Madiun, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICONEBS}, year={2021}, month={2}, keywords={consumer financing payment default}, doi={10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304559} }- Sundaru Guntur Wibowo
Hedy Pandowo
Ahmad Khudori
Galuh Try Prawesti
Year: 2021
Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 Towards Consumer Financing Institutions
ICONEBS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304559
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to know and understand the implementation of consumer financing agreements and to solve problems that arise if there is default by the debtor in the implementation of the consumer financing agreement. This research is specific to the handling of late payments or even bad credit, which then the object of the agreement is executed / withdrawn by the debitor in relation to the Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 which stipulates that the execution of fiduciary guarantees must obtain permission from the court. , meanwhile, the consumer financing agreement is equipped with a fiduciary certificate which has the power of execution. This becomes interesting to research so that it provides understanding for the parties concerned. This study uses a normative approach, using primary data and secondary data which are then analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques.
