Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy, and Governance Studies, ICAS-PGS 2019, October 30-31, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Indonesia

Research Article

The Formation of Election Law Number 7/2017 in the Perspective of Collaborative Governance

Download430 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.30-10-2019.2299342,
        author={Aditya Kelana Dewantara and Aditya Perdana},
        title={The Formation of Election Law Number 7/2017 in the Perspective of Collaborative Governance},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy, and Governance Studies, ICAS-PGS 2019, October 30-31, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICAS-PGS},
        year={2020},
        month={8},
        keywords={collaborative governance public policy stakeholder election regulation},
        doi={10.4108/eai.30-10-2019.2299342}
    }
    
  • Aditya Kelana Dewantara
    Aditya Perdana
    Year: 2020
    The Formation of Election Law Number 7/2017 in the Perspective of Collaborative Governance
    ICAS-PGS
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.30-10-2019.2299342
Aditya Kelana Dewantara1,*, Aditya Perdana1
  • 1: Political Science,Universitas Indonesia
*Contact email: adityakelana@gmail.com

Abstract

The main argument in this article is the law making of Electoral Law Number 7/2017, based on collaborative governance perspective, can be seen as formal and ceremonial things. This study uses a qualitative method, data collection was conducted using observation, interview, and documentation. DPR RI members actively played as the main actors during deliberation phase in this law-making process. The main reason is this Law has strongly impact factors to the existence and sustainability of parliament members and political parties in the future. The law-making process was almost closed and has limited access for stakeholders. Some crucial and alternative agenda from CSOs (civil society organizations) were not fully accommodated. It also means that the collaborative governance principles did not apply to this case while the involvement of election stakeholders was limited to access the process.