Research Article
The Behavior of Bureaucratic Apparatus the State Civil Apparatus Placement in the Parigi Moutong District, Central Sulawesi Province
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.30-10-2019.2299329, author={Suasa Suasa and Syamsul Bachri and Mustainah Mustainah and Nasir Mangngasing and Mohammad Riski Borman}, title={The Behavior of Bureaucratic Apparatus the State Civil Apparatus Placement in the Parigi Moutong District, Central Sulawesi Province}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy, and Governance Studies, ICAS-PGS 2019, October 30-31, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICAS-PGS}, year={2020}, month={8}, keywords={apparatus behavior bureaucracy government placement politic}, doi={10.4108/eai.30-10-2019.2299329} }- Suasa Suasa
Syamsul Bachri
Mustainah Mustainah
Nasir Mangngasing
Mohammad Riski Borman
Year: 2020
The Behavior of Bureaucratic Apparatus the State Civil Apparatus Placement in the Parigi Moutong District, Central Sulawesi Province
ICAS-PGS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.30-10-2019.2299329
Abstract
The behavior of the bureaucratic apparatus in the placement of some echelon II, III, and IV positions of the State Civil Apparatus in Parigi Moutong District is still based on kinship relations and political services. This study aims to examine and analyze the behavior of bureaucratic apparatus and the implementation of employee placement in carrying out their main tasks and functions during one period of governance year 2013 – 2018. Qualitative descriptive research methods are used to describe the phenomena occurred in the field. Data collection is done through observation, interviews, and documentation analysis. The result shows that the bureaucratic apparatus behavior of employee placement in that period was (1) Care, does not fully followed. (2) Excellence, was not effective. (3) Transformative, does not achieved. (4) Professionals, still less professional. (5) Integrity, does not effectively implemented. (6) Vision of novelty does not achieved and (7) democratic governance agent does not maximize.
