About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia

Research Article

Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation of Physics Subjects Learning Outcomes

Download771 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778,
        author={Martina  Eryyani and Acep  Kusdiwelirawan},
        title={Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation of Physics Subjects Learning Outcomes},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICEHHA},
        year={2021},
        month={8},
        keywords={curriculum 2013; physics subjects; learning outcomes},
        doi={10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778}
    }
    
  • Martina Eryyani
    Acep Kusdiwelirawan
    Year: 2021
    Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation of Physics Subjects Learning Outcomes
    ICEHHA
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778
Martina Eryyani1,*, Acep Kusdiwelirawan2
  • 1: Physics Education Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka, Indonesia
  • 2: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka, Indonesia
*Contact email: martina.erryani@gmail.com

Abstract

This study aims to determine the implementation of the curriculum in schools with curriculum evaluation activities to determine the obstacles and constraints faced by schools so that they can be fixed and smoothen the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in schools. The research method used is qualitative research with a context, input, process, and product (cipp) evaluation model. The technique of collecting data by using triangulation (combined). So it can be interpreted that school 2 (two) has a very good implementation of the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage, which means that it has not fully implemented the 2013 curriculum. Of the three schools, the average percentage is 91.27%. The results of the learning activity questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of school 1 (one) had a percentage of 62.82%, in school 2 it was 98.47%, and school 3 had a percentage of 83%. So it can be interpreted that 2 (two) schools have learning activities that are in accordance with the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage which means that it has not fully implemented learning activities. From the three schools, the average percentage was 81.43%.

Keywords
curriculum 2013; physics subjects; learning outcomes
Published
2021-08-27
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778
Copyright © 2021–2025 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL