Research Article
Online and Face to Face Composition in the Various Types of Learning Style
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.3-11-2018.2285725, author={Hamonangan Tambunan and Marsangkap Silitonga and Nelson Sinaga}, title={Online and Face to Face Composition in the Various Types of Learning Style}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education (ACEIVE 2018), 3rd November 2018, North Sumatra, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ACEIVE}, year={2019}, month={7}, keywords={online face to face learning style}, doi={10.4108/eai.3-11-2018.2285725} }- Hamonangan Tambunan
Marsangkap Silitonga
Nelson Sinaga
Year: 2019
Online and Face to Face Composition in the Various Types of Learning Style
ACEIVE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.3-11-2018.2285725
Abstract
The experiments have been conducted on electro technical teaching for ensuring the most suitable combination of online learning and face-to-face in blended learning on the certain type of learning style. There were 166 participants involved and scattered in five groups. The full online (OL) and full face to face (F2F) were control groups, and there were three combinations of online and face to face in different forms made, namely 25-75, 50-50, and 75-25 OL-F2F. The Learning Style Questionnaire and Electro technical Competencies Test were used in tracing the participants’ learning styles and testing their competence. The 2-Way Anova, Sig. 0,05 shown the group of theorist and pragmatist learning style were better learned by the same OL-F2F composition, while the activist and reflector style were by the 75-25 and 25-75 of OL-F2F composition respectively.
