Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education (ACEIVE 2018), 3rd November 2018, North Sumatra, Indonesia

Research Article

Results of Basic Learning Pattern’s Learned by Memorization Learning Model

Download749 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.3-11-2018.2285601,
        author={Dina  Ampera and Nurhayati  Nurhayati and Farihah  Farihah and Rosnelli  Rosnelli},
        title={Results of Basic Learning Pattern’s Learned by Memorization Learning Model},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education (ACEIVE 2018), 3rd November 2018, North Sumatra, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ACEIVE},
        year={2019},
        month={7},
        keywords={learning outcomes pattern memorization learning model},
        doi={10.4108/eai.3-11-2018.2285601}
    }
    
  • Dina Ampera
    Nurhayati Nurhayati
    Farihah Farihah
    Rosnelli Rosnelli
    Year: 2019
    Results of Basic Learning Pattern’s Learned by Memorization Learning Model
    ACEIVE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.3-11-2018.2285601
Dina Ampera1,*, Nurhayati Nurhayati1, Farihah Farihah1, Rosnelli Rosnelli1
  • 1: Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia
*Contact email: dinaampera@unimed.ac.id

Abstract

This study aims to find out the basic learning outcomes of the pattern learned by memorization learning model for students in Vocational High School 3 Pematangsiantar as a population, with the instrument using the learning outcomes test, then analyzed by t test. The results of the analysis showed that the learning outcomes learned by conventional learning showed the average results of (57.03), and the learning outcomes learned using the memorization learning model (72.03). Data distribution of learning outcomes with conventional learning is normally distributed where 0.151 <0.157 and student learning outcomes data with learning memorization learning models are normally distributed where 0.079 <0.151 and homogeneous variance data for f count 1.71 <f table 1.82. It was concluded that learning outcomes with memorization learning models were better than conventional learning where the test results showed t -4.761 <t table 1.67. So it proved that there was no effect of student learning outcomes that were learned using memorization learning models with students who were taught using conventional learning. This means that the use of learning memorization learning models can be used as alternative learning in schools.