Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, EBGC 2019, 3 October, UPN " Veteran" East Java, Surabaya, Indonesia

Research Article

Accounting Lecturer’s Perception On Academic Cheating

Download118 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.3-10-2019.2291906,
        author={Soeparlan  Pranoto and Erry  Andhaniwati and Invony Dwi Aprilisanda},
        title={Accounting Lecturer’s Perception On Academic Cheating},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, EBGC 2019, 3 October, UPN " Veteran" East Java, Surabaya, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={EBGC},
        year={2020},
        month={2},
        keywords={academic cheating gender moral development dysfunctional behavior},
        doi={10.4108/eai.3-10-2019.2291906}
    }
    
  • Soeparlan Pranoto
    Erry Andhaniwati
    Invony Dwi Aprilisanda
    Year: 2020
    Accounting Lecturer’s Perception On Academic Cheating
    EBGC
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.3-10-2019.2291906
Soeparlan Pranoto1,*, Erry Andhaniwati1, Invony Dwi Aprilisanda1
  • 1: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, 0819385864811, 081339366660, Indonesia
*Contact email: pranoto@upnjatim.ac.id

Abstract

This study discusses the perception of accounting lecturers about academic cheating from the perspective of the main task (Tridharma) as an obligation. Lecturers' perceptions of academic cheating are reviewed from Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory and Decision Making based on Gender Theory. This study uses a qualitative method. There were 6 informants. The results showed that there were two informants at level 6, indicated by the choice of conscience decisions according to personal principles, they combined beliefs in accordance with conscience and religious teachings. From the research it can be concluded that male and female informants can play roles according to their position according to gender theory. There is no difference of opinion in taking appropriate action to prevent them from committing fraud in the academic field.