Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, ISET 2019, 29th June 2019, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Research Article

Violation of Politeness Principle On Students Speech In Multicultural Society: Sosiopragmatic Study

Download283 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290327,
        author={Afif Restu Fauzi and Ida  Zulaeha and Rahayu  Pristiwati},
        title={Violation of Politeness Principle On Students Speech In Multicultural Society:  Sosiopragmatic Study},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, ISET 2019, 29th June 2019, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ISET},
        year={2020},
        month={1},
        keywords={violation of politeness multicultural society sociopragmatics},
        doi={10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290327}
    }
    
  • Afif Restu Fauzi
    Ida Zulaeha
    Rahayu Pristiwati
    Year: 2020
    Violation of Politeness Principle On Students Speech In Multicultural Society: Sosiopragmatic Study
    ISET
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290327
Afif Restu Fauzi1,*, Ida Zulaeha1, Rahayu Pristiwati1
  • 1: Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
*Contact email: Afifrfauzi@ymail.com

Abstract

Students at Al Asror MTs get special lessons about good morals. Ideally, all utterances obey the rules of politeness. However, it is often found students who are suspected of violating the rules of politeness. Allegedly, violations are motivated by non-linguistic factors. This study aims to analyze and explain the factors that cause violations of politeness in student speech in multicultural societies. This approach uses a pragmatic and descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection using the method of refer to and capable. Data analysis uses the pragmatic equivalent method. The results of the analysis showed 45 speeches violated the tact maxim; 10 speeches violating the generosity maxim; 13 speeches violating the approbation maxim; 24 speeches violating the agreement maxim; 26 speeches violate the modesty maxim; and 7 speeches violating the simpathy maxim. Violations are motivated by non-linguistic factors, namely social, geographical, social distance between speakers, family, and psychological