Research Article
Representation of Power in The Panel of Judges’s Speech at Semarang District Court's Trial: Sosiopragmatic Study
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290283, author={Eri Prihatmini and Ida Zulaeha and Rahayu Pristiwati}, title={Representation of Power in The Panel of Judges’s Speech at Semarang District Court's Trial: Sosiopragmatic Study}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, ISET 2019, 29th June 2019, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ISET}, year={2020}, month={1}, keywords={representation of power judge’s speech act}, doi={10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290283} }- Eri Prihatmini
Ida Zulaeha
Rahayu Pristiwati
Year: 2020
Representation of Power in The Panel of Judges’s Speech at Semarang District Court's Trial: Sosiopragmatic Study
ISET
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290283
Abstract
The language used by the Panel of Judges in court has its own uniqueness. The purpose of this study was to analyze the representation of power in the Panel of Judges' in the Semarang District Court’s trial. This research uses sociopragmatic approach. The data used is a fragment of the Panel of Judges' speeches which allegedly contains pragmatic power and representation of power in it. Data collection was carried out by referring to proficient free technique, note-taking and recording techniques. Data analysis is done using the equivalent method. The data analysis technique used in this study is the determining element sorting technique. Representation of power analyzed using contextual methods. The results of the research show the power of the panel of judges' speeches in the trial representing power that comes from coercive, reward power, legitimate, expertise and referent power