Research Article
Design of Identify, Decide, Act, Communicate, Reinforce (IDACR) Module Based on Evaluation Ability in Learning Momentum Concepts
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.28-9-2019.2291093, author={Warsini Wulandari and Siska Desy Fatmaryanti and Sriyono Sriyono}, title={Design of Identify, Decide, Act, Communicate, Reinforce (IDACR) Module Based on Evaluation Ability in Learning Momentum Concepts}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, ICE 2019, 27-28 September 2019, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICE}, year={2020}, month={2}, keywords={evaluation ability idacr modules momentum}, doi={10.4108/eai.28-9-2019.2291093} }- Warsini Wulandari
Siska Desy Fatmaryanti
Sriyono Sriyono
Year: 2020
Design of Identify, Decide, Act, Communicate, Reinforce (IDACR) Module Based on Evaluation Ability in Learning Momentum Concepts
ICE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.28-9-2019.2291093
Abstract
It becomes a necessity for developing teaching materials with a learning model that makes students more active and can improve students' high-level thinking skills, especially the ability to evaluate. The design of new teaching materials has been carried out in the form of modules in momentum concept learning. Modules are generated using the stages of the Identify, Decide, Act, Communicate, Reinforce (IDACR) learning model with evaluation capabilities. There are also information processing characteristics in this module. Therefore, in the competency test, before students answer the questions presented information relating to the questions asked. The focus of the research is the validation and analysis of content on the module. The validity of the module is based on expert judgment and the content analysis of momentum concepts using indicators of students’ evaluation ability. The instrument used is a validation sheet for material experts, media experts and Physics teachers. The results of this study indicate IDACR module based on evaluation ability in learning momentum concepts are valid and feasible to use in learning. The average value given by the validator is 3.60 with good and reliable categories with a percentage agreement (PA) of 99.0%. Through content analysis it was found that the module facilitates students in symbol identification and equality recognition in problems.