Urgence for Establishing Rules of Authority Of The Chairman State Court to Change Determination of The Execution of the Execution Created Officer First

One of the things that hindered the confiscation of executions was the change in the chairman of the District Court because they had to wait for a new official. The purpose of this study was to examine the urgency of establishing the rules of authority of the Head of the District Court to change the decision on confiscation of executions made by previous officials and to examine the factors that hindered the implementation of confiscation of executions. The approach used in this study is an empirical normative approach. This research data collection technique was carried out through conventional and online literature searches. The data analysis technique used in this research is qualitative because the data is presented in a descriptive-narrative way. The results of the study indicate that the granting of authority to change the determination of the confiscation of execution of the Head of the District Court aims to resolve a case and determine the position and legal rights of a case. The granting of this authority is usually carried out due to a mutation of the Head of the District Court. Execution assignments that can be changed back are executions that are condemnator. The amendment to a confiscation of execution must be based on a request from the applicant for execution, because this change in application can also relieve the new Head of the District Court in carrying out his duties.