Research Article
Paragliding Ground Handling Training Model With a Combination of Belayer, Ancoring and Simple Towing in Above Normal Wind Condition
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.28-4-2021.2312140, author={Sahri Sahri and Sugiharto Sugiharto and Nanang Indardi and Nur Amin and Aristiyanto Aristiyanto and Alya Ega Suciana and Wahyu Indra Wijaya}, title={Paragliding Ground Handling Training Model With a Combination of Belayer, Ancoring and Simple Towing in Above Normal Wind Condition}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sports, Health, and Physical Education, ISMINA 2021, 28-29 April 2021, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ISMINA}, year={2021}, month={10}, keywords={paragliding ground handling ground handling method}, doi={10.4108/eai.28-4-2021.2312140} }
- Sahri Sahri
Sugiharto Sugiharto
Nanang Indardi
Nur Amin
Aristiyanto Aristiyanto
Alya Ega Suciana
Wahyu Indra Wijaya
Year: 2021
Paragliding Ground Handling Training Model With a Combination of Belayer, Ancoring and Simple Towing in Above Normal Wind Condition
ISMINA
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.28-4-2021.2312140
Abstract
This research to improve students' skills Ground Handling abilities in Paragliding Subjects using the belayer, anchoring, and simple towing methods. Respondents are 18 students of the Sport Science Department who took Paragliding courses. Inclusion criteria were healthy, never had a heart attack. Respondents with height phobia were divided into 3 treatment groups and 1 control group. This research was conducted in two cycles, each cycle consists of two meetings. The results of percentage classical completeness in cycle 1 of 48.2% increase to 73.2% in cycle 2. The initial stage 4 groups that have the ability to master ground handling material in wind conditions above normal with mastery between 6% - 7%, in the middle stage there was the belayer group with a result of 22%, the ancoring group 19%. and the simple towing group 21%, but at the end of the session the results achieved had a significant difference, namely 65% for the belayer group, 52% for the ancoring group, while the simple towing group reached 73% capable, this result ignores gusty fluctuations. Hot and humid weather conditions that can change from time to time when learning data are documented.