Research Article
Violations of Anti-Monopoly Practices in Business Competition in the Four-Wheeled Motor Vehicle Tire Industry
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.28-10-2023.2341771, author={Evita Isretno Israhadi and Hasan Basri}, title={Violations of Anti-Monopoly Practices in Business Competition in the Four-Wheeled Motor Vehicle Tire Industry}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 3rd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2023, 28 October 2023, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={MIC}, year={2023}, month={12}, keywords={violation; antimonopoly practices; business breach}, doi={10.4108/eai.28-10-2023.2341771} }- Evita Isretno Israhadi
Hasan Basri
Year: 2023
Violations of Anti-Monopoly Practices in Business Competition in the Four-Wheeled Motor Vehicle Tire Industry
MIC
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.28-10-2023.2341771
Abstract
This research describes violations of anti-monopoly practices in business competition in the four-wheeled motor vehicle tire industry. The author uses a normative juridical approach, using primary and secondary data. Data analysis uses qualitative analysis. The results show that perpetrators of money laundering crimes are subject to sanctions based on Articles 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Money Laundering Crimes. The most important substance in the regulation of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning Anti-Monopoly is a Prohibited Agreement which has been stipulated or regulated in Articles 4 to 16. The facts of the trial found that Reported Parties I-VI were proven to have violated the rules stipulated in Law no. 5 of 1999, precisely in Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 11. Article 5 (passage 1) expresses that each business entertainer is precluded from settling on concurrences with contending business entertainers to decide the cost of merchandise as well as administrations that should be paid by purchasers or clients in a similar market. The two translations of violations of these two articles were obtained from APBI presidium meetings in the period 2009 to 2012 which indicated that there was an agreement to restrain production and regulate price regulation.