Research Article
Weaknesses Of The Implementation Of The State Administrative Court Verdicts: A Case Study In Indonesia
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285595, author={Francisca Romana Harjiyatni and Farid Ario Yulianto}, title={Weaknesses Of The Implementation Of The State Administrative Court Verdicts: A Case Study In Indonesia}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ELLIC}, year={2019}, month={7}, keywords={verdict administrative court government administration}, doi={10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285595} }- Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
Farid Ario Yulianto
Year: 2019
Weaknesses Of The Implementation Of The State Administrative Court Verdicts: A Case Study In Indonesia
ELLIC
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285595
Abstract
Fair legal protection is hampered by the Administrative Court Verdicts that cannot be enforced in the event that the government officials as the defendants are not willing to voluntarily carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The presence of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning the Government Administration does not provide a way out to overcome this obstacle. The Government Administration Law gives the authority to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts entirely to the executives/government. The Administrative Court is not authorized to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The Government Administration Law further weakens the functions of the Administrative Court, because the Administrative Court does not have the authority to carry out the verdicts, and in fact the authority is fully delegated to the executives/government. Optimal legal protection for the people is very dependent on the legal awareness of the officials to comply with the Administrative Court Verdicts
