Research Article
The WTO Trade Remedies (Safeguards) and its Implementation in Indonesia: Study Case of PT. Krakatau Steel vs. China
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.26-9-2020.2302645, author={Hamzah Hamzah and Wahyu Sasongko and Rohaini Rohaini and Rahmi Rizki Amelia}, title={The WTO Trade Remedies (Safeguards) and its Implementation in Indonesia: Study Case of PT. Krakatau Steel vs. China}, proceedings={Proceedings of The International Conference on Environmental and Technology of Law, Business and Education on Post Covid 19, ICETLAWBE 2020, 26 September 2020, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICETLAWBE}, year={2020}, month={12}, keywords={safeguards regulations domestic industries protection}, doi={10.4108/eai.26-9-2020.2302645} }- Hamzah Hamzah
Wahyu Sasongko
Rohaini Rohaini
Rahmi Rizki Amelia
Year: 2020
The WTO Trade Remedies (Safeguards) and its Implementation in Indonesia: Study Case of PT. Krakatau Steel vs. China
ICETLAWBE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.26-9-2020.2302645
Abstract
In international trade law, as a measure to protect the domestic market from losses caused by sudden and unforeseen overflows of imports and to protect its domestic industries from unfair practices, the World Trade Organization requires members to enforce trade remedy measures against imports, such as anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and anti-security measures. Safeguard itself is one of the trading instruments that are widely applied by members of World Trade Organization. In fact, according to the World Trade Organization report, after India, Indonesia is the second most active country using safeguard instruments. Through case study methods, especially anti-dumping cases between PT. Krakatau Steel against hot-rolled coil/plate (HRC/P) alloy imports from China this research is conducted to determine the implementation of World Trade Organization trade remedies (safeguards) in Indonesia.
