Research Article
Incentives and Disincentives of Discretion by Public Authorities
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295225, author={A R E Purnomo and D G Suharto and R D Wahyuningsih}, title={Incentives and Disincentives of Discretion by Public Authorities}, proceedings={Proceedings of the First Brawijaya International Conference on Social and Political Sciences, BSPACE, 26-28 November, 2019, Malang, East Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={B-SPACE}, year={2020}, month={5}, keywords={government administration bereaucracy policy discression}, doi={10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295225} }- A R E Purnomo
D G Suharto
R D Wahyuningsih
Year: 2020
Incentives and Disincentives of Discretion by Public Authorities
B-SPACE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295225
Abstract
The mindset of most people in Indonesia nowadays is that bureaucracy management is an intricate activity. Until now, the highest level of public complaints is still directed to the government agencies or bureaucracies. The highest complaint is due to the intricate administration within the government bureaucracy. Whereas in 2014, the government enacted a Law no. 30 about Government Administration, with the hopes of improving and facilitating public services, one of the musing the right of discretion by public authorities. However, the polemic happening now is that the discretion policy can be a legal trap, so public authorities are afraid to implement such policy. This research used a method of literature study (qualitative approach), by looking for some references of relevant data and information with the case or problem raised, in order to answer: empirical problem discretion.
