Research Article
Disparity Between Criminal Confiscation and General Confiscation and its Legal Implications
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349445, author={Afriendi Sikumbang and Suparji Achmad}, title={Disparity Between Criminal Confiscation and General Confiscation and its Legal Implications}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2024, 25 May 2024, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLSSEE}, year={2024}, month={8}, keywords={disparity criminal confiscation general confiscation legal implications}, doi={10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349445} }- Afriendi Sikumbang
Suparji Achmad
Year: 2024
Disparity Between Criminal Confiscation and General Confiscation and its Legal Implications
ICLSSEE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349445
Abstract
Disparity in the regulation of criminal confiscation and general confiscation is a complex issue in the context of criminal law. Criminal confiscation and general confiscation have different purposes, with criminal confiscation aiming to secure resources related to a specific crime, while general confiscation aims to secure assets that are considered unauthorized or unlawful. The differences in scope, procedure and legal consequences between these two types of confiscation pose challenges in maintaining fairness and legal sustainability. This research investigates the essential differences between the two types of confiscation and their legal implications in practice. Research on the disparity between criminal and general confiscation arrangements and their legal implications is relevant in the context of improving and refining the criminal justice system.