Research Article
Criticism of the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement by the Corruption Eradication Commission: A Review from a Law and Policy Perspective
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349437, author={Thomy Faisal and Azis Budianto}, title={Criticism of the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement by the Corruption Eradication Commission: A Review from a Law and Policy Perspective}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2024, 25 May 2024, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLSSEE}, year={2024}, month={8}, keywords={developer bankruptcy pkpu}, doi={10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349437} }- Thomy Faisal
Azis Budianto
Year: 2024
Criticism of the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement by the Corruption Eradication Commission: A Review from a Law and Policy Perspective
ICLSSEE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349437
Abstract
Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia (KPK) tasked with eradicating corruption, has made various changes over time to legal instruments and institutional policies. However, these efforts have often been ineffective and have even weakened the institution, exacerbated by poor law enforcement officials. This study, using a normative juridical approach and sociological analysis, examines the effectiveness of corruption eradication laws in Indonesia. It concludes that while the law-making process itself is not flawed, the implementation is problematic. Effective anti-corruption efforts require law enforcement officials who are not only honest and clean but also committed to their duties. Additionally, some KPK policies need revision, as they currently hinder rather than help the institution's performance.
