Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Environmental Governance, ICONEG 2019, 25-26 October 2019, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Research Article

Policy-Making of Strategic Plan in Success of Five Year Development Agenda of Pandeglang Regency of Banten Province

Download150 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.25-10-2019.2300513,
        author={Andriansyah  Andriansyah},
        title={Policy-Making of Strategic Plan in Success of Five Year Development Agenda of Pandeglang Regency of Banten Province},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Environmental Governance, ICONEG 2019, 25-26 October 2019, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICONEG},
        year={2020},
        month={10},
        keywords={policy making strategic plan decentralization},
        doi={10.4108/eai.25-10-2019.2300513}
    }
    
  • Andriansyah Andriansyah
    Year: 2020
    Policy-Making of Strategic Plan in Success of Five Year Development Agenda of Pandeglang Regency of Banten Province
    ICONEG
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.25-10-2019.2300513
Andriansyah Andriansyah1,*
  • 1: Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo
*Contact email: andriansyah@dsn.moestopo.ac.id

Abstract

The policy-making of the five-year strategic plan of its substance involves participation in the process of policy formulation through Development Deliberation (Musyawarah) in the decentralization of regional autonomy. That is, it delivers the authority of the central government to the autonomous regions in determining the policy (political authority) and implementing the policy (administrative authority), based on local voice and local choice. The local government is expected to identify needs, formulate development goals, and make appropriate strategic plans (Renstra) to achieve its objectives.The research used qualitative method with descriptive approach by collecting various data from various sources with triangulation technique. The purpose of the study describes the three things, namely setting agenda, policy formulation and budgeting in a formulation of stakeholders' participation. Research results: First: participation in development planning in tokenism and elitist-party stages, partnerships between communities with bureaucracy and political officials are still subordinate union of partnership. Dialogue held is still pseudo and decision making is not done by bargaining among actors. Second: The quality of planning is still bad, because it has not been able to answer the needs of the community and there is no interconnected substance between documents with one another.