Research Article
Analysis of Independent Learning Development Independent Campus Learning (MBKM) in Increasing Learning Motivation Students on Group Dynamics Course at Universitas Negeri Medan
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.24-11-2022.2332602, author={Anifah Anifah and Sani Susanti and Friska Harahap and Anita Anita}, title={Analysis of Independent Learning Development Independent Campus Learning (MBKM) in Increasing Learning Motivation Students on Group Dynamics Course at Universitas Negeri Medan }, proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Science Education in The Industrial Revolution 4.0, ICONSEIR 2022, November 24th, 2022, Medan, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICONSEIR}, year={2023}, month={6}, keywords={mbkm learning development learning motivation}, doi={10.4108/eai.24-11-2022.2332602} }
- Anifah Anifah
Sani Susanti
Friska Harahap
Anita Anita
Year: 2023
Analysis of Independent Learning Development Independent Campus Learning (MBKM) in Increasing Learning Motivation Students on Group Dynamics Course at Universitas Negeri Medan
ICONSEIR
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.24-11-2022.2332602
Abstract
The Freedom to Learn Program not only provides a new paradigm for students but also provides new challenges for lecturers as educators in tertiary institutions. Every lecturer in a tertiary institution can establish cooperation by organizing the learning process at other tertiary institutions, but it is still adjusted to the areas of expertise and disciplines possessed by each lecturer. The number of samples used was 82 people, namely students who took part in the independent campus program. The findings from the results of this study can be described as follows: (1) indicators of learning planning in the Very Good category 14%, Good Category 49% and Fairly good category 21%, while for the bad category 16% (2) Design and Manufacturing aspects teaching materials fall into the very good category by 29%, good category by 52%, Pretty good category by 18%, while for the bad category is 1% (3) Material Submission indicators are very effective category by 23%, Good category by 20%, Enough category Good by 20%, while for the Bad category by 1% (4) Aspects of interaction indicators in learning very good category by 17%, good category by 25%, Fairly Good category by 39%, bad category by 19%. From the data above it can be concluded that based on the results of the analysis of lesson planning, teaching materials, delivering material and learning interactions are the good category.