About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence, ICIAAI 2026, 22-24 May 2026, Singapore, Singapore

Research Article

A Phase-Aware Automated Parameter Search Benchmark Framework and Search Behavior Study for OpenROAD Physical Design

Download9 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365248,
        author={Junkai  Wang},
        title={A Phase-Aware Automated Parameter Search Benchmark Framework and Search Behavior Study for OpenROAD Physical Design},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence, ICIAAI 2026, 22-24 May 2026, Singapore, Singapore},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICIAAI},
        year={2026},
        month={8},
        keywords={OpenROAD; Automated Parameter Search; Physical Design; Design Space Exploration; Stage-Aware Evaluation; Benchmark},
        doi={10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365248}
    }
    
  • Junkai Wang
    Year: 2026
    A Phase-Aware Automated Parameter Search Benchmark Framework and Search Behavior Study for OpenROAD Physical Design
    ICIAAI
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365248
Junkai Wang1,*
  • 1: Glasgow College, UESTC, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, China
*Contact email: 2960150W@student.gla.ac.uk

Abstract

Parameter settings in open-source EDA flows increasingly affect design convergence and physical results, making a reproducible and comparable automated parameter search framework necessary. Based on OpenROAD and OpenROAD-flow-scripts, this paper builds an automated parameter search benchmark that executes flows, parses logs, extracts metrics, and classifies trials into three categories: final, grt_partial, and invalid. Controlled experiments are then conducted on search space design, reward mechanism design, and trial budget. Results show that the framework can reliably execute, parse, and evaluate parameter search processes while preserving valid intermediate physical signals in complex designs. Experiments on AES further indicate that the global search space is more stable across random seeds, the narrow search space achieves better final solutions when successful, the stage-aware reward performs better for some seeds but is seed-sensitive, and increasing the trial budget from 10 to 20 helps markedly, whereas gains from 20 to 30 are limited.

Keywords
OpenROAD; Automated Parameter Search; Physical Design; Design Space Exploration; Stage-Aware Evaluation; Benchmark
Published
2026-08-31
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365248
Copyright © 2026–2026 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center
  • Cookie Preferences

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL