About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence, ICIAAI 2026, 22-24 May 2026, Singapore, Singapore

Research Article

An Improved MOON Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Negative Sample Quality Awareness

Download9 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365235,
        author={Sen  Yang},
        title={An Improved MOON Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Negative Sample Quality Awareness},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence, ICIAAI 2026, 22-24 May 2026, Singapore, Singapore},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICIAAI},
        year={2026},
        month={8},
        keywords={Federated learning Model comparison learning Non-IID data Adaptive weights MOON},
        doi={10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365235}
    }
    
  • Sen Yang
    Year: 2026
    An Improved MOON Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Negative Sample Quality Awareness
    ICIAAI
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365235
Sen Yang1,*
  • 1: College of Computer Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Nanning, China
*Contact email: yangsen@glut.edu.cn

Abstract

Federated learning achieves privacy protection through multi-device collaborative training, but model drift caused by the heterogeneity of Non-IID data severely impacts performance. The MOON algorithm uses the previous-round model as negative samples and the global model as positive samples to introduce a contrastive loss to mitigate drift, but indiscriminately rejecting the previous-round model results in the loss of valuable knowledge. This paper proposes an adaptive contrastive federated learning method based on negative sample quality awareness: the rejection weight is dynamically adjusted by calculating the cosine similarity between the previous-round model and the global model—reducing rejection when quality is high to preserve valuable knowledge, and maintaining normal rejection when quality is low to correct bias. In the CIFAR-10 Non-IID scenario, the test accuracy reaches 74.78% (a 0.58% improvement over MOON), the average loss is reduced by approximately 10.09%, and convergence is better, validating the effectiveness of this adaptive mechanism.

Keywords
Federated learning, Model comparison learning, Non-IID data, Adaptive weights, MOON
Published
2026-08-31
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.22-5-2026.2365235
Copyright © 2026–2026 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center
  • Cookie Preferences

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL