About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 1st African International Conference, AIC 2025, 22-23 May 2025, Bradford, United Kingdom

Research Article

Dissecting Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria and Organisational Resilience

Download4 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.22-5-2025.2364435,
        author={Lamiegha  Brinemugha},
        title={Dissecting Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria and Organisational Resilience},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st African International Conference, AIC 2025, 22-23 May 2025, Bradford, United Kingdom},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={AIC},
        year={2026},
        month={7},
        keywords={Boko Haram counterinsurgency counterterrorism decapitation ideology leadership},
        doi={10.4108/eai.22-5-2025.2364435}
    }
    
  • Lamiegha Brinemugha
    Year: 2026
    Dissecting Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria and Organisational Resilience
    AIC
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.22-5-2025.2364435
Lamiegha Brinemugha1,*
  • 1: Peace Studies and International Development Department, University of Bradford, United Kingdom
*Contact email: l.brinemugha@bradford.ac.uk

Abstract

Boko Haram (Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad, JAS) remains one of Africa’s most resilient insurgent groups despite sustained leadership decapitation efforts by the Nigerian state. This paper examines why the removal of key commanders has failed to dismantle the group and has sometimes coincided with adaptation, fragmentation, and continued violence. Moving beyond leader-focused counterterrorism, it reconceptualises Boko Haram as a violent social movement shaped by governance failures, ideological cohesion, and decentralised structures. Using a qualitative case study design, the study draws on interviews with military personnel and journalists, alongside analysis of insurgent communiqués, policy reports, and academic literature. Guided by Social Movement Theory, it explains Boko Haram’s resilience through decentralised command systems, leadership succession mechanisms, resource mobilisation, and ideological framing that sustains recruitment and cohesion beyond leaders. Findings show that leadership decapitation produces only short-term disruption and does not significantly weaken the group where succession systems and ideological continuity persist. The paper argues that effective counterterrorism must extend beyond leadership targeting to include governance reforms that strengthen legitimacy, accountability, rule of law, and civilian administration, alongside community-based counter-radicalisation involving religious leaders, local actors, and civil society.

Keywords
Boko Haram, counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, decapitation, ideology, leadership
Published
2026-07-23
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.22-5-2025.2364435
Copyright © 2025–2026 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center
  • Cookie Preferences

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL